UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW

OFFICE OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE

 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF Male Respondent                        )            File No. A 

                                                                                    )            In Removal Proceedings

                                                                                    )         

 

Respondent’s Brief in Support of His Motion for a Speedy Bond Hearing, Request for Early Scheduling, and Release

 

 

I.             Statement of Facts[1]

 

The INS arrested respondent on [date of arrest].  [list respondent’s immigration status if he has one], [date of admission, if the INS admitted him].  To date, the INS has not filed a charging document with the Immigration Court. 

 

II.             Attorney General Lacks the Authority to Detain the Respondent

 

A.              The Regulation Exceeds the Scope of the Statute

 

Section 287.3 implements 8 U.S.C. § 1457, INA § 287.  Section 287 does not mention extended detention prior to filing a charging document to enable the Attorney General to conduct an investigation.[2] 

An agency cannot exceed the scope of the authority Congress provides.  This is so regardless of how salubrious the purpose of the agency’s action.  See, e.g., Food and Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp, 529 U.S. 120 (1999) (striking Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) regulatory attempt to mitigate devastating health consequences from cigarette smoking).     The Attorney General cannot use regulations to expand the INS’ authority to detain a noncitizen without a warrant beyond the authority Congress provided in §287 any more than the FDA could use its general powers to regulate tobacco.  

When Congress believes that national security concerns justify expanding the Attorney General’s authority to detain noncitizens it does so by passing legislation.  For example, in 1950, Congress passed the Internal Security Act section 23 of which authorized the Attorney General: 


. . . Pending final determination of the deportability of any alien taken into custody under warrant of the Attorney General, such alien may, in the discretion of the Attorney General (1) be continued in custody; or (2) be released under bond in the amount of not less than $ 500, with security approved by the Attorney General; or (3) be released on conditional parole. . . .

 

Without comparable legislation today, the Attorney General is powerless to expand the INS’ detention authority.  

 

B. The Constitution Mandates the Amended Language in 8 C.F.R. § 287.3 

 

The Administrative Procedures Act requires an agency to give the public notice and an opportunity to comment before a regulation takes force, unless one of several specific exceptions apply  [cite]. The Attorney General published 8 C.F.R. § 287.3 as an interim regulation.  The Attorney General justified publishing 8 C.F.R. § 287.3 as an interim regulation because the Constitution did not mandate the regulation.  [fed reg cite]. The language and purpose of the regulation do not support the Attorney General’s conclusion.  

The source of the phrase “emergency or other extraordinary circumstance” is Supreme Court Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.  Section 287.3 of 8 C.F.R. includes the phrase “emergency or other extraordinary circumstance” in the amended regulation because it would be unconstitutional to detain a person indefinitely without qualification.   See Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 US 103 (19 ); County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, (1991).  The phrase “emergency or other extraordinary circumstance” is lifted verbatim from County of Riverside, 500 U.S. 44, 57 (1991).  Because the Attorney General included the “emergency or other extraordinary circumstance” language to avoid violating the United States Constitution, it is a constitutionally mandated regulation.  Consequently, the Attorney General incorrectly characterized the regulation as not constitutionally mandated.  By not publishing the regulation as a proposed rule and by failing to justify publishing within one of the exceptions under the Administrative Procedure Act, the regulation should not take effect until after the public has notice and the opportunity to comment.

C.              The Attorney General Has Held Respondent for an Unreasonable Period of Time

 

Assuming, for the sake of argument and without conceding either point, that the Attorney General has the authority to promulgate 8 C.F.R. § 287.3 and that it is lawful for it to take effect upon publication, the Attorney General has violated the regulation by detaining respondent for an unreasonable period of time. 

D.              The Regulation Violates the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution

 

            The respondent asserts that the Attorney General’s continued detention without filing a charging document violates his right to substantive and procedural due process.

II.             Conclusion

The Attorney General should release the respondent because: the INS lacks the authority to hold the respondent since 8 C.F.R. §287.3 exceeds the scope of the Attorney General’s authority; the Attorney General’s failure to justify publishing 8 C.F.R. §287.3 means that it should be treated as a proposed regulation not yet in effect; and the Attorney General has held that respondent for an unreasonable period of time under the circumstances.  

 

 

Dated:______________                                              Respectfully submitted by his attorney,

                                                                                    _______________________________

                                                                                    Attorney Name

                                                                                    Attorney Address

                                                                                    Attorney Phone

                                               

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

 

            I hereby certify that I served the foregoing Brief in Support of Motion  for a Speedy Bond Hearing, Request for Early Scheduling, and Release on the on the Immigration and Naturalization Service by [state manner of service e.g. hand delivery] to:

[INS address]

                       

 

 

Dated: ____________________                                            ____________________________

                                                                                                Signature of person serving motion

 

 

 

 

 

 



 [1] Facts asserted in this section are based on the attached exhibits, including respondent's declaration, or on testimony which will be given by respondent.

[2] Section 1357. Powers of immigration officers and employees

 

    (a) Powers without warrant

      Any officer or employee of the Service authorized under

    regulations prescribed by the Attorney General shall have power

    without warrant -

        (1) to interrogate any alien or person believed to be an alien

      as to his right to be or to remain in the United States;

        (2) to arrest any alien who in his presence or view is entering

      or attempting to enter the United States in violation of any law

      or regulation made in pursuance of law regulating the admission,

      exclusion, expulsion, or removal of aliens, or to arrest any

      alien in the United States, if he has reason to believe that the

      alien so arrested is in the United States in violation of any

      such law or regulation and is likely to escape before a warrant

      can be obtained for his arrest, but the alien arrested shall be

      taken without unnecessary delay for examination before an officer

      of the Service having authority to examine aliens as to their

      right to enter or remain in the United States;

        (3) within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of

      the United States, to board and search for aliens any vessel

      within the territorial waters of the United States and any

      railway car, aircraft, conveyance, or vehicle, and within a

      distance of twenty-five miles from any such external boundary to

      have access to private lands, but not dwellings, for the purpose

      of patrolling the border to prevent the illegal entry of aliens

      into the United States;

        (4) to make arrests for felonies which have been committed and

      which are cognizable under any law of the United States

      regulating the admission, exclusion, expulsion, or removal of

      aliens, if he has reason to believe that the person so arrested

      is guilty of such felony and if there is likelihood of the person

      escaping before a warrant can be obtained for his arrest, but the

      person arrested shall be taken without unnecessary delay before

      the nearest available officer empowered to commit persons charged

      with offenses against the laws of the United States; and

        (5) to make arrests -

          (A) for any offense against the United States, if the offense

        is committed in the officer's or employee's presence, or

          (B) for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United

        States, if the officer or employee has reasonable grounds to

        believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is

        committing such a felony,

      if the officer or employee is performing duties relating to the

      enforcement of the immigration laws at the time of the arrest and

      if there is a likelihood of the person escaping before a warrant

      can be obtained for his arrest.

    Under regulations prescribed by the Attorney General, an officer or

    employee of the Service may carry a firearm and may execute and

    serve any order, warrant, subpoena, summons, or other process

    issued under the authority of the United States. The authority to

    make arrests under paragraph (5)(B) shall only be effective on and

    after the date on which the Attorney General publishes final

    regulations which (i) prescribe the categories of officers and

    employees of the Service who may use force (including deadly force)

    and the circumstances under which such force may be used, (ii)

    establish standards with respect to enforcement activities of the

    Service, (iii) require that any officer or employee of the Service

    is not authorized to make arrests under paragraph (5)(B) unless the

    officer or employee has received certification as having completed

    a training program which covers such arrests and standards

    described in clause (ii), and (iv) establish an expedited, internal

    review process for violations of such standards, which process is

    consistent with standard agency procedure regarding confidentiality

    of matters related to internal investigations.